Showing posts with label philosophy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label philosophy. Show all posts

Thursday, 17 March 2011

Why OR in sports? Some reflections

Why is OR applicable to sports?

Many sports have a score, a number, to be maximised or optimised - hence there is a link to OR

Most sports have limited resources, to be used optimally - hence OR, The resources may be the team, or time, or money

Many sports operate sequentially, with decisions being made in order - just like in dynamic programming

Sports events require transport and supply chains - areas where OR has expertise

In a separate blog, I have mentioned the range of sports which have provided abstracts in IAOR. Most of those links are to strategy in the sport itself. My other blog on the subject considers the problems of scheduling transport.

Monday, 20 April 2009

Lessons for O.R. from the primary school

The same article in "The Independent" mentioned the primary school at St Ives; there was a thought-provoking quote from its head teacher (Joanne Dean) too. She too stressed the need for lifelong learning for everyone (including the O.R. profession!).

We never think to ourselves:
"That's it; I have learnt all I need to know."
It never happens

Lessons for O.R. from the junior school

Britain's "The Independent" daily paper carries a supplement on education most weeks. Last Thursday (16th April) there was a page about two schools in St Ives, Cornwall. Although St Ives is a popular holiday destination, many local people are not well off, as tourism is low paid, seasonal work. The Junior School had problems when it was inspected in about 2003, and the head teacher, Sue Smith (no relation) was drafted in to sort things out. The feature covered many of her achievements and philosophy.

Two quotes struck me as being relevant to the O.R. profession. First, a homily from her office wall:

In times of change, the learners will inherit the earth whilst the knowers will be beautifully equipped to deal with a world which no longer exists.

Second, the response to Sue Smith's question at the start of school assembly, "What are we doing?":

We are thinking, looking, listening, not talking, and concentrating.

Why the relevance to O.R.? For the first one, it is a reminder that learning never stops; as O.R. professionals, we are agents of change in systems, and that rebounds on us -- we need to be people who learn and change in turn. And for the second, those five characteristics should be the ones we show when we face a new management problem; maybe the fourth is not so relevant, and might be replaced by "Not talking irrelevantly".